After chocolate, dark if you please, I’m a sucker for cameras. Always have been since the first time, I slid a black & white negative into an enlarger in a dark room and made my first 8″x10″ print. I was a goner. My last film camera was a relatively inexpensive Nikon SLR with a few lenses and filters.
Then came the digital age. I have lost count of how many digital cameras I have owned, between 8 and 10 conservatively, probably more. I am one of those seekers who is constantly in search of the perfect camera that I can afford. This causes a huge discrepancy as you can imagine between mind and matter and I always spend more than I intend.
For the last five or six years, I have faithfully carried a small pocket camera with me in my bag everywhere I go. My first weapon of choice was a tiny Canon Elph SD1000 with a fairly short zoom. Honestly, it was a gem and never, ever took a bad shot that was not my fault. It was easy to use with a few easily accessible features such as selective color, B&W and sepia choices, pretty good compared to the competition that long ago.
The one basic feature the Canon lacked was a more powerful zoom which was really my only complaint and was, at times, frustrating when I wanted to shoot, say, a bird or other far away object. At the time, there wasn’t much on the market with that larger zoom in a pocket camera.
I decided instead to replace my old Olympus “bridge” camera with a newer model with a 8x zoom. Total piece of crap. It didn’t seem to have any kind of image stabilization so therefore, about every other shot was blurry. After about a year of frustration, I chose a Panasonic-Lumix bridge camera with a 10x zoom that was sweet and I loved it. Again, it had great glass and nearly every shot was superb.
Bridge cameras with their fixed lenses are great for travel since most of them fit nicely into a bag without the need for carrying around lenses and all the other camera gear a DSLR requires. When DH and I went to Las Vegas I took the little Canon and the Panasonic-Lumix and was pretty happy that I had covered nearly everything I wanted to shoot.
But, I still felt lost without a more powerful zoom in what I call my “bang-around” camera. So, enter the Nikon S9100 with an 18x zoom and touted as a great low light camera. This was slightly larger than the Canon but not so much I couldn’t carry it with me everyday. So, I signed up for one. I thought the shots were a little soft but not a deal breaker. I knew anything larger than a 5″x7″, maybe an 8″x10″ would be out of the question. What did turn me off was that its low light capabilities were a major disappointment. I learned this when I took the camera to a concert and every shot was horrible. I felt worse when I put the cam away and started shooting with my iPhone and all the shots were very good. I sold the Nikon.
After some research and reading every review I could find, next I settled on another Panasonic-Lumix about the same size as the Nikon with an 18x zoom. Great glass, better low-light than the Nikon. A keeper. Well, DH, who has been inexplicably generous in a thousand different ways for reasons I will never understand asked me if I had an “extra” digital camera I wasn’t using. A friend has taken a photograph of a car DH had restored. They took the media card to the local drug store and in 10 minutes walked out with photographs. That impressed the hell out of DH. How could I say no? He is now the proud owner of my new Panasonic-Lumix and I was thrilled I could finally do something for him.
I then decided to take all my old cameras and sell them to get what I could out of them. Between Amazon and EBay, surprisingly, I sold all but one for more than I thought I could. I always keep every box and whatever comes with the camera and that is a real plus when selling electronics. This left me with some funds for one of the newest and most feature packed small cameras to come out this year, the SONY DSC HX-90V. Reviews were very good though no true manual settings like Aperture and Priority mode. I’ve learned that all cameras are a compromise. I love that it has sweep panorama that is the best in the industry plus an HDR mode that takes three shots in milliseconds and averages them resulting in a photograph that is more balanced with less shadow and/or over-exposed areas. It also has several creative filters like selective color, sepia, monochrome (B&W) and others. The best thing about the camera is that, compared to the Nikon and Panasonic-Lumix, its low light capabilities are much, much better as is the flash, which, when used, gives a much more natural look to the photograph.
My route to a great camera to carry with me has been circuitous to say the least. Lots of money, frustration and disappointment. The big box stores rarely carry the most advanced, feature-rich models so trying them out is impossible. Reviews by trusted camera enthusiasts not beholden to the manufacturer are very useful but also often confusing with erroneous information. What puzzles me most are the manufacturer’s websites that never give complete information on any of their cameras and their features. They really dumb down the information for consumers, something I find insulting frankly. If I am going to invest in an advanced camera, whether it be a DSLR costing thousands or a fully-featured point & shoot for a few hundred, I think consumers deserve to know everything there is to know about what I am considering.
Until the next best thing happens in camera-land, I’m very happy (so far) with my new SONY.









